My generation has seen a couple of pandemics and pandemic scares. From H5N1 influenza (the dreaded bird flu which never came to fruition) to H1N1 (the swine flu which did spread across the world) and from SARS to anthrax the media has time and again presented the danger that these agents have on world health. But truth be told none of these have had the impact from both a social and medical perspective than has the HIV pandemic. This year marks the 30th anniversary of the first reported instances of HIV in the US and I thought I would take a little time to remind everyone what this virus has done not only to those infected but how it has also been a pandemic with great social implications.
In the 80's the infection also became a death sentence. With no treatment available for this disease those infected could only wait until they became infected with a normally harmless bacteria and the body was overrun. Because of this, partners would leave each other once HIV was diagnosed seeing it as a mark of imminent demise given from the person they loved. Luckily, miracle drugs emerged that could prolong the life-span of the infected for years and years and HIV. Now, HIV is no longer a death sentence and has turned into something more of a chronic illness.
The wonder drugs target reverse trasncriptase prevent the production of DNA, and thus any step that comes after. The identification of this enzyme proved a leap forward in the field of biology. The central dogma has always been DNA--> RNA --> Protein. That's the way life works. It's the schema that makes you you and makes me me. From skin to hair, every organism on Earth is under the influence of this genetic process. This is why when researchers said they found an enzyme that makes RNA into DNA (RNA --> DNA) the scientific community scoffed at it, unable to believe that the central dogma which rules all of biology at the level of the gene could possibly be broken. However, the scientists prevailed and would be rewarded with the Nobel Prize.
This enzyme also proves the be the necessary driving force behind the evolution of the virus. The problem is that reverse transcriptase does not have a proofreading mechanism like the DNA polymerases in your cells. In humans, mutations in DNA are bad so the machines that make DNA have methods of checking their work and fixing mistakes. But, in microbes eliminating this mechanism can proove beneficial. Since the replication rate of microbes is so much more frequent than any other organism, if you eliminate the proof-reading, you can potentially cause mutations that allow the pathogen to produce functional proteins but with slightly altered attributes. This could mean the ability to bind a different receptor or in the case of HIV, the evasion of drugs. This is why new drugs are constantly developed for HIV. Reverse Transcriptase can mutate the genome and prevent it from being recognized by the drugs.
Although we have the medical means necessary to fight the disease what it really comes down to is money. Poor people and poor countries cannot afford the drugs, a point satirized in South Park where the cure to HIV is "concentrated cash." Also, drug users that don't have access to clean needles are also at risk of contracting HIV and other blood-bourne pathogens. There needs to be an investment in the research for a vaccine to the virus as well as preventative care not only here in the U.S. but worldwide. It's only with this amount of cooperation that we can ever hope of nearing a day where the infection rate and mortality rate of HIV is 0.
Great discussion, Ray. I really like all the points you hit, African Sesame Street possibly being my favorite.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Stine. I did a project on this for my ANTH course last semester so I had a lot to say.
ReplyDelete